For Najib, unlike the more civil Badawi, it is not elections which he is looking forward to, but how to secure victory by hook or by crook, or indeed how he can remain at the top in a reasonably legitimate way. Over the few months that he is a leader, the term ‘legitimate’ has become so indeterminate.
To go for all-out elections is suicidal , at least for the near future, for Najib’s administration. That, Najib himself knows very well. Out of the eleven by-elections the nation has seen since March 2008, BN only managed to secure 3 wins, namely in Batang Ai, Bagan Pinang and controversially in Hulu Selangor. The latest BN loss in Sibu sent shivers through Najib’s camp; has the tsunami actually reached the East Malaysian coast, they must be wondering.
These were indeed bad omens for BN – and the nation.
Najib is a fighter, one who does not shy away from street fighting. He is a new breed of BN leader, one that BN desperately needs to win back the loss the former PM Badawi seemed so willingly accepted (for which the latter has been punished.) That Perak was won back amidst legal controversies is one of Najib’s signatures. He never keeps it a secret that Selangor should also be won back at any price, and his army is working on it.
Najib’s strategy leading to PRU13 seems to be that the bottom line is BN stays at Putrajaya in the aftermath, whatever it takes. His armies of SB, police, EC, BN machinery are all hard at work to ensure that. The signs that come from the ground seem to be that a victory will not come easily for BN. Najib has then to look for another way, and that is the unfortunate course for the nation.
Malaysia has not known, barring the dark days of May 13, 1969, a violent confrontation between her various races and religions. Indeed the people of Malaysia have learnt that they have to live with each other, and even generally agreed that plurality is a blessing, not a curse. The vast majority of the Malaysians seem to rational enough to avoid the racialist path to solving problems. That is not to say there have not been violent outbursts, but then they were isolated and readily esolved.
Therefore, the events of the past months just do not tally with the prevalent trend. Everywhere suddenly one sees signs of intolerance. There was the event of cow heads in a Selangor temple and the desecration of Churches. Now one sees headmasters or principals, one after another, hurling racist remarks . The episode of the Friday sermon in Penang is a nother point in case. The latest was the Surau in Seremban. One cannot help but pondering whether the nation is spiraling towards anarchy …
All these point to some sinister forces at work, with a common objective, to poison the atmosphere w on the road to PRU13. That they are widely reported by the main media shows someone wants it to prove a point. [It has been an open secret that the mainstream media exercises self-censorship and sometimes with advice from the power-that-be, and sensitive news do not easily get reported.] Another sad thing is that the police seems quite incapable to prevent these incidents, and even more impotent in determining the culprits. We are talking here about the same police which has so efficiently quelled street demonstrations, stopped opposition ceramahs, and even incriminate peaceful vigils. The responses from the BN leaders are even more wanting.
All these spell bad omens for the nation. Unless the authority takes serious steps to preempt further such incidents while bringing the culprits behind previous ones to book and punished them heavily, one cannot help but to conclude that we are at the verge of an anarchy – planned anarchy; perhaps, that is so because BN - and Najib - see it as the only way to remain in power post PRU13.
And the nation still remembers the Altantuya ghost - and that she has not yet been exorcised.
6 comments:
As a Malay Muslim, I would prefer Najib to be at the helm for the time being rather than allowing an altenative government heavily backed by chauvinist non malay kafirs with agendas against the interest of the Islamic movement in Malaysia. What is the point of having a PR government where Islamic elements are a minority. Just on the basis of UMNO being labelled 'corrupt to the core' does not mean PR is an angel. I would rather go for a safer bet then risking the whole Islamic agenda to extremist non muslims being at the helm!!
You cannot be suggesting that means, however evil, may justify an end, a noble one at that? I think a more reasonable position is that we should go for Islamic values, such as good governance, instead of defending a government dominated by corrupt 'Muslims'. History is replete with examples of corrupt Muslim leader who eventually led his nation to destruction. Remember Idi Amin? Perhaps Saddam Hussein with an overwhelmingly nationalist party behind him is a better example ...
Comparing Najib with Idi Amin and even Sadam Husin speaks volumes of the confuse state of mind of the so call Islamist these days.Are you trying to say Iraq under US/Zionist backed regime is better than under Saddam. Cant you see Israelis can sleep tight with no Saddam around. Its just a matter of choosing between two evils.
What is so good about PR state governments anyway except corruption changing hands to those in power. My point here is, while we work for an Islamic government, its better to reform the present Muslim dominated government rather than having a PR government heavily dominated by Chinese/Indians anti Islamic elements. Its clear that PAS would rather tied themselves in an agreement of not making Malaysia an Islamic State rather than unite with UMNO for the sake of Islamic unity that could easily pave the way for the implementation of Islamic laws. I cant understand DAP whom admitted against Islamic State and Hudud laws can be friends while UMNO with the same aqidah are made enemies. Ironic..... Putting means justifying end does not fit here....
That's exactly my point. That is, a country with a corrupt government is prone o foreign intervention, such as in Iraq. US came in to 'take care' of the injustices perpetrated by Saddam while the entire world stood by. Of course it was just an excuse but nobody dared to oppose given the nature of Saddam's regime, and of course Israel reaps the benefit of a fallen Muslim country.
We are for good governance. I never, for one moment, suggest that I prefer the PR to BN, but that a clean and fair election is the road to a peaceful, sustainable, stable nation.
It is unfortunate that after 53 years of independence, the difference between the nation, the government and that party that rules is so obscure ... And the by-product is confused minds deprived of the real meaning of independence.
To be sure, the Prophet (PBUH) clearly underlined the political principle of Islam when he said that 'Islam liberates man from subordination amongst them ...' and that and objective of the Islamic nation is 'that a woman will be able to travel alone from Yemen to Hadramaut fearing only Allah and the wolf ...'
You're right, but your beloved Anwar is clearly the tool of the neo-cons....what is so Islamic about that...
This good governance thing is mere slogan cooked by the west to duped muslims to ape them....some naive Islamist are buying into this trap...what a pity...
Now we have civil society....another bunker....
What has the prophet got to do with this?? Clearly liberalism, pluralism have crept in....May Allah guide us!!
The end is clerly wrong here, the means is irrelevant anyway!!
Post a Comment