How is this possible? The following situation explains the arithmetics.
Consider a nation in which there are only 3 constituencies, P1, P2, P3, where two political parties, A and B, are contesting. Supppose further that each constituency has 10 voters who always come out to vote in earnest.
In the ensuing election, Party A gets 6 votes each in P1 and P2, but gets no vote whatsoever in P3. On the other hand, Party B secures 4 votes each in P1 and P2, as well as sweeps all the 10 votes in P3.
In the ensuing election, Party A gets 6 votes each in P1 and P2, but gets no vote whatsoever in P3. On the other hand, Party B secures 4 votes each in P1 and P2, as well as sweeps all the 10 votes in P3.
Altogether Party A gets only 12 votes, or 40%, whereas Party B gets 18 votes, or 60%, leading to Party B getting an overall majority of 6 votes, or 20%.
In the system, Party A is declared the winner in the election since it secures the most number of votes in each of two (out of three) constituencies, so that it secures 2 seats in a parliament of three, two-third majority at that!
Although Party A does not enjoy the overall majority, it nevertheless wins, while Party B with the overall majority still loses.
It is not hard to invent a scenario in which a party has an even bigger overall majority but still loses. Imagine the same situation in which everything remains unchanged except that constituency P3 has 100 votes and Party B secures all. Now Party B still loses although it garners 108 votes against 12 votes which Party B gets. The situation, albeit a bit exaggerated, and hence improbable, is nevertheless always a possibility, as Sherlock Holmes would surely agree.
In the system, Party A is declared the winner in the election since it secures the most number of votes in each of two (out of three) constituencies, so that it secures 2 seats in a parliament of three, two-third majority at that!
Although Party A does not enjoy the overall majority, it nevertheless wins, while Party B with the overall majority still loses.
It is not hard to invent a scenario in which a party has an even bigger overall majority but still loses. Imagine the same situation in which everything remains unchanged except that constituency P3 has 100 votes and Party B secures all. Now Party B still loses although it garners 108 votes against 12 votes which Party B gets. The situation, albeit a bit exaggerated, and hence improbable, is nevertheless always a possibility, as Sherlock Holmes would surely agree.
As Walter Cronkite used to say in signing off his news program, that’s the way it is.
No comments:
Post a Comment